Though, with No nomenclature to describe the term ‘Collaborative Law’, it is a means to solve the disputes between parties. A council reflects the parties selected by the parties themselves. The lawyers chosen belong to an identified group or institution with a resolution to settle the dispute between customers without resorting to any kind of litigation or NY adjuratory procedure. The collaborative law is the fast growing field and the other means of dispute resolution ADR. No threat and electricity is used
Interested professionals have developed different versions and have put variety of characteristics. The most significant feature is that no dispute is solved by the use of electricity or any kind of litigation. Now, this strategy has contentious and challenging aspect also. Collaborative lawyers can abandon the collaborative law approach if desired by the any of those parties. And, it is a contractual obligation. Every party should have a fantastic faith in the lawyers or it is deterrent. The practice s meaningful and is helping the people in their desire to resolve disputes. Sometimes the attorneys are not proficient enough to take the effort to outcomes. They are not as experienced. However, after going through several collaborative law cases they create themselves proficient as imaginative, confident and capable ones to successfully solve customers’ problem.
Another characteristic of this way would be to educate the client to become Pro-active in all phases of dispute resolution procedure. This strategy is a guarantee to the customers of having the control over the expense of process, control over the process itself and over the outcome of the dispute. Adjudicatory model does not guarantee all this. Society is frustrated and the expertise of the standard legal procedures. The requirements of the Francisco De Armas Cubas customers are evolving and lawyers have the challenge to discover the methods to provide services to the evolving challenge. The needs and issues of the customers are the focus of the collaborative law approach and it keeps them connected through the procedure to the procedure till the results of the case for a settlement. Separation is predictable and inevitable results of the traditional litigation model.
The customer has some expectations. He needs to have a fair and just Outcome from the process. If the customer does not get a satisfactory result he will hold the lawyer responsible for this. According to lawyers, the collaborative law process is fruitful. It clearly defines at the start the roles of the customer and the counsel. The customers are accountable for being in the dispute that it also is their obligation to accept mutually the results that solve the dispute. Face to face meetings throughout the procedure give the customers opportunities to develop into responsible ones and take the conclusion of the work undertaken by the lawyers.